Thursday, March 08, 2007

Why We Do It

I was doing this hot and heavy at first. It's typical for me to get into a project in the beginning, but lose steam down the road. This one, though, was different. It's tied to my own pet project, Urilia, so I was sure I'd stick with it.

If you look at the older posts, you'll see things got really political for a while. The whole Katrina-hurricane-New-Orleans situation brought that on. I noticed that afterward, a lot of people who were into this stuff dropped off the map, too.

What it demonstrated, was most of the people who are game developers are ardent socialists. Throughout the situation, this began to bleed through in their posts regarding the games for which they code. For me, this realization helped explain the backwards logic I so often see applied to problems in World Building.

I was looking to these guys for inspiration and some professional advice. What I got always turned into political arguements, because politics is everywhere. Politics isn't just an area of discussion, but it's a life-philosophy. When you hold a broken life-philosophy, it only follows that you will apply the same errant mental processes to everything you do. That's why so many crafters of game worlds create "fixes" that require more "fixes".

Anyway, now that I've got enough perspective on the situation, I'm going to re-apply myself to keeping this blog up-to-date.

Tuesday, May 30, 2006

Skill Check Part II

Well, I finally realized I wasn't actually using the difficulty. Unbelievable as that might be, it's true.

Now that I've done it, will it work okay?

Friday, May 19, 2006

Skill Checking

Welp, I'm going to start posting my code. What the heck. I'll share it.

Anyway, I'm starting with my skill check system. Basically, I think it's messed up.

I'm running a POL095 server. I do not use the core CheckSkill function, but a syshook_checkskill.src.


use uo;
use os;
use util;

include "include/attributes";
include "include/client";


program SyshookCheckSkill ( )

Syslog ( "Installing skillcheck..." );
return 1;

endprogram

exported function NewCheckSkill ( character, skillid, difficulty, points )

var attribute := GetAttributeIDBySkillID ( skillid );

Print ( "The Attribute is: " + attribute );

var player_Skill := GetAttribute ( character, attribute );
var deniedTest := BaseToRaw ( player_Skill );
var skillCheck;

Print ( "The skill used is: " + player_Skill );
Print ( "Your Raw Skill is: " + deniedTest );

if ( deniedTest == 0 )
SendSysMessage ( character, "You are untrained in this area." );
return 0;
endif

if ( player_Skill < 13 )
skillCheck := 13;
else
skillCheck := player_Skill;
endif


if ( skillCheck <= ( difficulty - 5 ) )
return 0;
elseif ( skillCheck >= ( difficulty + 15 ) )


var charMaxAttribute := ( "max" + attribute );
var maxSkill := GetObjProperty ( character, charMaxAttribute );
var rawMaxSkill := BaseToRaw ( maxSkill );

rawMaxSkill := ( rawMaxSkill + 1 );

var currentRawSkill := BaseToRaw ( player_Skill );
var possibleNewRawSkill := ( currentRawSkill + 1);

if ( rawMaxSkill > possibleNewRawSkill )
AwardRawSkill ( character, attribute, 1 );
StatIncrease ( character, attribute );
endif

return 1;
else

var dieRoll := ( skillCheck + 20 );

dieRoll := RandomInt ( dieRoll );

if ( dieRoll <= skillCheck )

var charMaxAttribute := ( "max" + attribute );
var maxSkill := GetObjProperty ( character, charMaxAttribute );
var rawMaxSkill := BaseToRaw ( maxSkill );

rawMaxSkill := ( rawMaxSkill + 1 );

var currentRawSkill := BaseToRaw ( player_Skill );
var possibleNewRawSkill := ( currentRawSkill + 1);

if ( rawMaxSkill > possibleNewRawSkill )
AwardRawSkill ( character, attribute, 1 );
StatIncrease ( character, attribute );
endif

return 1;
else
return 0;
endif

endif

endfunction

Wednesday, April 26, 2006

An excuse to stay up later

That's what this is.

Even though I'm sure no one ever reads this, and it doesn't much matter if they do, I think about it often and feel guilty. Yes, guilt because someone might read it and wonder why I never update.

I bet a lot of blogs end up like this.

Well not me. This is about world design, and I've been designing my butt off. Creating an online world is damn hard work and it's only fair that I inflict it on the rest of the internet!

So, after taking a long 6 months or so off from scripting, I'm right back at it. As usual, in a flurry of activity I have created two whole new systems for the server, fixed a few, and broken one of the biggest.

I rewrote our skill gain scripts. Now you actually have to be successful in something in order to gain skill. Novel idea, eh? It is when you consider what I was working with. In any event, I also had to re-tie stat gain to skill usage. That actually wasn't that hard.

I fixed a bunch of bugs in my other new scripts, too. Character creation could be a bear on my server until I looked back through it, recently. All this, and I've broken magic.

Yes, magic. It's very frustrating. I think I can fix it, but I'd like to make it work the way it used to work before I start making it work differently.

pffft

Saturday, September 10, 2005

Best Damn Blog About Katrina

No, not mine...

Bill Whittle wrote an article titled, "Tribes". It's very well written, and is far more eloquent than I could be. I suggest you read it before swallowing one more single propaganda pill from the media.

To the rare few who actually drop in on my blog from time to time, you might notice I've removed Damion Schubert and Scott Jennings from the list of "Smart Guys". After taking a pounding on their boards (argue with stupid people and they will club you over the head with it), and noticing a lack of anything deeply meaningful regarding our world of on-line gaming, they are gone.

I have come to an understanding, however, of why so many developers are so good at identifying their failures yet are incapable of learning from them. It's the liberal mentality. I want my cake, and I want to eat it too, and in a theoretical world where Shreodinger's Cat can walk through walls, I can do just that.

The Katrina disaster has brought all of this clearly into focus for me. As such, I'm only linking up people who seem to have a genuine insight into on-line worlds and their creations. I'm quite sure many of them are probably liberals, but at least they have a significant contribution to make, instead of just commenting on press releases or yammering nonsensically about some theory based on circular logic.

Wednesday, September 07, 2005

Because I Doubt He Won't Delete My Post

Yeah, I'm done with Damion Shubert and Scott Jennings. These guys have no clue what the "real world" is all about. They have no concept of what makes human beings tic. Read below. I copy/pasted a conversation on Damion's blog regarding the New Orleans situation. Similar conversations have occured on Scott's blog, so I'm finished with him, as well.


Musings on New Orleans
Filed under: General, Politics — Damion @ 10:06 pm
Sorry for the lack of updates this week. I’d blame the heavy workload I’m experiencing right now but, truth be told, the events on the Gulf Coasts seem to make any musing I could possibly put forth about game design to seem small and trite. I’ve recieved letters from people in the past thanking me for games that have resulted in meeting their soulmates and from cancer patients who have thanked me for allowing them to feel like fully functional human beings inside of a virtual space. But in the wake of the courage shown by the emergency personnel fighting this disaster, I feel like the maker of insignificant baubles and trinkets. I’ve given money to the Red Cross, and I’d urge anyone else so inclined to give what they can.

Not that everything has gone swimmingly. I have little doubt that the death toll of this event will surpass 9/11. The property damage already has. And yet, I’m continually surrounded by responses to the events I find appalling. Scott’s update points out the most egregious examples by our media, our government and our president. The Blame Game has started from the left while New Orleans still burns. Of course, that wouldn’t have been possible if the president had shown an iota of leadership with some level of gravitas instead of attending a birthday party, a sham ‘town hall’ for a failed political initiative and, most infamously, a guitar lesson.

And, of course, the pure hatemongers stepped forward to blame America’s sins for God’s Wrath. And here I thought the south were all Red States. Apparently, God destroyed New Orleans because the Southern Decadence festival was to be held this week, specifically today. Apparently, God was a couple days early, which sounds like a personal problem. Perhaps next time, God should think about baseball, or recite the alphabet backwards.

Oh, and can we please actually KNOW SOMETHING before we all put on the tinfoil hats?

It never fails to surprise me how surprised everybody is. “Nobody could have predicted this” is a common refrain on the news. New Orleans is, in fact, surrounded on three sides by a gulf, a lake, and the mightiest river in the US. The city is a bowl-shaped depression that rests below sea level. The levies were in desperate disrepair, but Louisiana’s economy was too depressed to fix it, and attempts to get the funding from the federal government failed. The city was long flirting with disaster. This, of course, makes the events only that much more horrific, because if government had functioned, it could have been minimized.

As a final thought: before every hurricane, major events or other whisp of trouble over the last 10 years, the press has gone out of their way to scare the hell out of us. This time was no exception- CNN trotted out an expert on the New Orleans topography to explain why this one could be the big one. This was on Saturday. I shook it off - the media has tried so hard to scare me with threads of shark attacks and millenium bomb threats that I just don’t even listen to it any more.

It turns out that guy was almost exactly right, every step throughout his description of what could go wrong. Sometimes, it turns out, the sky actually is falling.

• • •
17 Comments »
I actually spent the 6 days *flew out Saturday afternoon at 3pm* before the hurricane, just (literally) north of the tracks installing a machine. I was sleeping at 124 Royal Street at the Holiday Inn (1 block north of Bourbon St.)

I felt just a hair guilty because I spent the entire week wishing God would wash that rotting crap-hole into the sea. The poverty of the city is appalling. I was there with a trainee and tried driving about 10 blocks in each direction searching for something we knew was decent to eat (Outback, or Applebee’s, etc.) We finally found an extremely expensive steak house (Dickie Brennan’s) between Royal and Bourbon.

The hotel was so bad we couldn’t count on being able to eat breakfast there, so we just picked up pre-packaged junk and bottled water at a gas station in the mornings. We tried 4 different gas stations. Food stamps are apparently a huge part of the economy, as the last place we went to had a sign stating they weren’t able to take food stamps for a while (guess a machine was down or something). The clerk was complaining about how much money they were losing over the last few days because of the problem…

Everything was crumbling, and not just in the French-quarter. Most people you saw had dirty clothes and bums slept everywhere. Watching people pass at dinner each night, my trainee commented that the area was so bad you didn’t even see “different walks of life” pass by the window. Just the indogent and the freaks (piercings, tattoos, snakes around the 40 yr-old pot-bellied hippie). The highlight of the week was the old woman we watched for 3 nights stopping and talking to anyone who would talk to her on the street out in front of our hotel. She looked normal enough, but on the fourth night when we stopped to see what she was all about, she told us “The cops are payin’ me $100 to hit . He beats up women and children, so they say they’ll pay me $100 to put a hit on him.”

Add to this that the machine distributer was on-site, as well (we were just there to retrofit the control system). This guy was as big a racist jackass as you’d ever met. I didn’t think people actually said things like, “That guy’s a f’ing n’er in a white man’s position!” Man, the needle on the racist-O-meter was screaming off the chart.

It is rewarding that the president of my company is going to talk to the president of that guy’s company about our continued relationship and his continued employment. My people were floored by the situation.

Yeah, nutty week, but not as bad as it was for all the people that had to go through the storm. I hope that the devastation is so complete they move the city or something. I also hope that enough people give enough money to take care of the survivors. In an event such as this, it doesn’t even bother me if the federal government uses my tax dollars to help those people, though, frankly….my tax dollars have been carrying many of those people for most of their lives already.

So that pretty much lines things out, and puts it straight into the correct political light. Anything else is pure agrandizing garbage.

Comment by Jaycen Rigger — 8/31/2005 @ 11:33 pm
At the risk of sounding harsh…

Darwin (Australia) was destroyed by a cyclone in 1974. There wasn’t much storm surge damage because Darwin is 10m above sea level (for the most part), but 80% of the homes were destroyed by the wind. After that, Darwin required all houses to be engineered for category 4 cyclones. That has since been weakened to category 3. (I think 3 is too low. My house is rated for a 4, and I have a store room that will withstand higher. All the framing is welded steel, with thousands of cyclone-coded screws to hold on the roof and walls.)

1) Houses in the gulf look like they’re coded for a category 2… which is way too weak. Since hurricanes have been hitting the gulf and florida forever, you’d think that sometime 50 years ago they would have required stricter building codes! No way… building stronger buildings is more expensive.

2) If you’re going to build your house in storm surge (or flood prone) area, build it on stilts and make sure those stilts can survive a storm surge.

3) If TV spends 2 days broadcasting “this is the worst storm in 50 years” and “new orleans might flood” and “mandatory evacuation” and “if you can’t evacuate we’ll provide safe shelter for you”, and you still stay in your non-coded flood-prone house, you’re a fool.

Comment by Mike Rozak — 9/1/2005 @ 12:13 am
If TV spends 2 days broadcasting “this is the worst storm in 50 years” and “new orleans might flood” and “mandatory evacuation” and “if you can’t evacuate we’ll provide safe shelter for you”, and you still stay in your non-coded flood-prone house, you’re a fool.

To be fair, most of the people who stayed behind had no means to leave. New Orleans has (had) a huge population that lived below the poverty line. Many don’t have cars. It also is almost completely isolated - surrounded by swamps and rivers on all sides means no real suburbs to flee to. I suspect few bus tickets were available.

A government study in 2001 said that a flood in New Orleans was the number three most threatened US location for a disaster (#1 was terrorist attack in NY, #2 was major earthquake in SF) - natural terrain heightens the problem, lack of good escape roots makes it worse. The fact that a lot of the housing down there was, shall we say, substandard, to be appropriately priced for the shockingly low standard of living in NO, made things much worse.

Comment by Damion — 9/1/2005 @ 12:38 am
I was there with a trainee and tried driving about 10 blocks in each direction searching for something we knew was decent to eat (Outback, or Applebee’s, etc.) We finally found an extremely expensive steak house (Dickie Brennan’s) between Royal and Bourbon.

To be fair, you were looking for a chain restaraunt in the middle of the largest tourist trap in the Southeast. New Orleans actually has (well, had, I guess) the best restaraunts in the country, but you were looking for them in the middle of the red light district and wondering why you were only finding cheap strip clubs.

Comment by Scott — 9/1/2005 @ 6:25 am
Damion said:

Sometimes, it turns out, the sky actually is falling.

Why do I get the itchy feeling that the neighborhood Jehovah’s Witnesses are going to be darkening my doorstep again this weekend? The ones ’round here seem to have a particular passion for natural disasters.

Mike said:

Darwin (Australia) was destroyed by a cyclone in 1974.

Do you live in Darwin, Mike? I’m down in Sydney…

Mike also said:

3) If TV spends 2 days broadcasting “this is the worst storm in 50 years” and “new orleans might flood” and “mandatory evacuation” and “if you can’t evacuate we’ll provide safe shelter for you”, and you still stay in your non-coded flood-prone house, you’re a fool.

As someone who has never owned her own TV in her entire life, I find this much less shocking than the fact that countless able bodied adults ended up in dire straits by the mere virtue of the fact that they couldn’t swim. I hope this encourages more people to learn swimming and lifesaving. I’m a terrible swimmer, but I’ll be damned if I ever get stuck in my attic in a flood.

Comment by Tess — 9/1/2005 @ 6:30 am
Scott said:

New Orleans actually has (well, had, I guess) the best restaraunts in the country, but you were looking for them in the middle of the red light district and wondering why you were only finding cheap strip clubs.

Scott speaks the truth. I have eaten wonderful food in New Orleans, and the prices were quite reasonable, as well. Also, were there still a New Orleans for you to go to, I would recommend staying at a Bed and Breakfast, rather than the Holiday Inn. There were some marvelous little B&Bs, which were priced insanely well, and had wonderful staff, and wonderful breakfast, and I’m gonna start crying in a moment…

Comment by Tess — 9/1/2005 @ 6:35 am
Yeah, and uhh…Brennan’s (the extremely expensive steak house you mentioned) is one of the finest steak houses in the US. The Brennan family restaurants are world-famous.

Looking for an Outback in downtown New Orleans…heh, too funny

Comment by Ray — 9/1/2005 @ 7:06 am
Ugh, sorry to pile on you, I didn’t read the rest of the replies before I posted.

Comment by Ray — 9/1/2005 @ 8:27 am
I know, I know, but I’m not a huge fan of that cuisine. However, I have developed a new appreciation for Jumbalaya. The smoked sausage (when cooked properly) is insanely delicious.

I’m not at all surprised by the news of the police looting SUVs, weapons and merchandise. I think it’s common knowledge just how rampantly corrupt the authorities in that area are.

I am, however, frustrated by the reports of certain morons in the area shooting at the military helicopters performing rescues. It’s disheartening to know that people (regardless of their socio-economic background) who want rescue are being denied the opportunity because of a few twits. Hopefully, they’ll track down the individuals responsible and those people will resist attempts at capture.

Comment by Jaycen Rigger — 9/1/2005 @ 11:53 am
I don’t think all of the police actions can be seen as corrupt. Reports have several of the police precinct houses as being underwater. Standard police cruisers aren’t well suited from crossing rubble and low standing water. Standard issue police weapons are no match for looters with machine guns. There’s undoubtedly some corruption, but an ill-equipped peace officer can either abdicate his authority or attempt to solve the problem as best he can. In this situation, I’d much rather he do the latter.

Of course, I also can see the other side of the looter’s mentality. They very much feel that society left them there to die. So fuck society. Does that excuse their current actions? No, but it might better explain them.

Shooting at rescue helicopters and overturning ambulances, though - that’s just ten kinds of inexplicable and wrong.

Comment by Damion — 9/1/2005 @ 12:59 pm
I see your point on the police situation. Considering how poor those areas are, I’m sure the cops are under-equipped. However, I’m hearing reports of cops snagging SUVs from dealerships, running looters off from Wal-Marts and then loading up their SUVs with goodies. THAT isn’t the result of being under-equipped.

I’m absolutely not interested in the thinking behind those lacking any moral compass. I grew up in a rotten situation at a level of poverty comparable to those people in New Orleans. Society has been doing everything it can to get those people out and help them.

Let me better explain that mentality to you; “I am the center of my universe. My feelings are the only thing that matter to me. I only really relate to other human beings in terms of how they make me feel about myself, or how I can use them to get something for myself. Other people exist to give me things.”

Undoubtedly, there are a variety of reasons people come to that attitude, but you can’t say it’s purely environment and how you’re raised. I grew up in that environment (until I was 11) and I was taught that attitude (until I was 15), and I was still smart enough to put 2 and 2 together. I have no empathy nor do I have sympathy for that life view, though I’m always willing to try to help someone think beyond it.

Comment by Jaycen Rigger — 9/1/2005 @ 4:01 pm
Damion wrote: “To be fair, most of the people who stayed behind had no means to leave. New Orleans has (had) a huge population that lived below the poverty line. Many don’t have cars. It also is almost completely isolated - surrounded by swamps and rivers on all sides means no real suburbs to flee to. I suspect few bus tickets were available.”

From some of the TV press conferences I’ve seen, I think (but am not 100% sure) that free transportation was offered.

Most of the people interviewed said they “didn’t think it would be that bad” and didn’t believe all the media hype. This is interesting; it shows that the media overhypes so much stuff that when something important is communicated people don’t believe it.

Tess wrote: “Do you live in Darwin, Mike? I’m down in Sydney…”

Someone else down under, and in a game company too (one of the 3 or 4 in australia)… Technically, I live an hour’s drive outside Darwin. After hearing my neighbor’s story of Cyclone Tracy, I wouldn’t be in Darwin if a 4 or 5 were going to hit, even in a cyclone-coded house. I’m 50 miles south, and should be a bit safer.

Comment by Mike Rozak — 9/1/2005 @ 5:37 pm
Oh of course, the Almighty must be angry at the sinners. I remember that from the Asian Tsunami too … all those heathens “deserved” it.

Such hatemongers have no right to call themselves Christians.

Comment by Josh — 9/2/2005 @ 10:16 am
Jaycen… RE:
“I’m absolutely not interested in the thinking behind those lacking any moral compass. I grew up in a rotten situation at a level of poverty comparable to those people in New Orleans. Society has been doing everything it can to get those people out and help them.”

I don’t know what you studied in school, nor what you do for a living. But when it comes to sociology, you are speaking madness. We seek understanding so that we can build models. We use those models to control outcomes. THAT is why their thinking is relevant. Furthermore, though you do seem mainly to focus on the “twits”, it’s hardly accurate to call anyone “lacking [in] any moral compass”. People are fully capable of doing things that they know are wrong. Why are they doing wrong things? They have their reasons, sound or not. If we understood when and why a human being (poor, rich, no matter) will choose to betray their morals, we can learn how NOT to push people until they break. Everyone breaks, sooner or later.

They shut down the city, taxis and all, BEFORE the evacuation. If you didn’t have a car they MIGHT take you to a hotel. This decision was made because no one gave a flying rat’s ass about the poor, or their need to leave. Friends of mine were trapped before they knew it. Society has chosen how to deal with emergencies, and that includes leaving the poor to rot. We (collectively) are hardly trying to “do everything we can to get those people out and help them”. Read the article, follow the links, if you haven’t already. Scott’s post is especially informative, if you need background.

I am disgusted by the incompetency of my country.

Comment by Justin Willcox — 9/2/2005 @ 6:44 pm
“People are fully capable of doing things that they know are wrong. Why are they doing wrong things? They have their reasons, sound or not. If we understood when and why a human being (poor, rich, no matter) will choose to betray their morals, we can learn how NOT to push people until they break. Everyone breaks, sooner or later.”

Thanks for letting us know where you come from right up front. It’s not theif fault, they were “pushed” into it. I see. Thanks, that’s very helpful.

“This decision was made because no one gave a flying rat’s ass about the poor, or their need to leave.”

Yes, I’m quite certain you’re correct. Know one cares about the poor, that’s why the liberal cause gains so much traction in America. It’s also why there are so many charity organizations. You’ve nailed it!

“Society has chosen how to deal with emergencies, and that includes leaving the poor to rot.”

SOCIETY chooses? I see. Here I thought the individual states and cities created their own emergency plans, much like San Francisco did just before the last major quake hit.

Obviously there is a conspiracy of hate/ignorance/un-caring going on in the U.S., and I think it’s time we all agree George Bush was at the center of it. Let’s impeach him.

“I am disgusted by the incompetency of my country.”

Huh, yeah… Sometimes I am, too. *shakes head sadly*

Comment by Jaycen Rigger — 9/5/2005 @ 12:58 am
Yes, I’m quite certain you’re correct. Know one cares about the poor, that’s why the liberal cause gains so much traction in America. It’s also why there are so many charity organizations. You’ve nailed it!

It’s beyond dispute that nobody, either in the Democrat-controlled local government, the mix-controlled state government or the Republican-controlled federal government stopped to think that maybe, just maybe, the famously impoverished underclass of New Orleans might not have a way out, or might not have had any money to buy a hotel room if they did get out.

Thanks for letting us know where you come from right up front. It’s not theif fault, they were “pushed” into it. I see. Thanks, that’s very helpful.

Making these sorts of moral judgments when you’re not ‘in the shit’ is very easy.

SOCIETY chooses? I see. Here I thought the individual states and cities created their own emergency plans, much like San Francisco did just before the last major quake hit.

The federal government is responsible for emergency plans when the level of catastrophe raises above a certain level. In the case of NOLA, the state government of LA requested a National Disaster be declared before the hurricane made landfall, and the federal government agreed. Once that happens, FEMA is supposed to take a much more active role.

Comment by Damion — 9/5/2005 @ 1:19 am
The problem with up-to-the-second news coverage is that often the newsmen (who we all know have no political agenda) get news to us before having all the facts in hand, not that it matters to them.

“It’s beyond dispute that nobody, either in the Democrat-controlled local government, the mix-controlled state government or the Republican-controlled federal government stopped to think that maybe, just maybe, the famously impoverished underclass of New Orleans might not have a way out, or might not have had any money to buy a hotel room if they did get out.”

We now know, Damion, that indeed many people knew the “impoverished” of New Orleans would have “no way out”. The emergency action plan, paid for by the Mayor’s office of the Parish of New Orleans, and created by a private company, said exactly that. The report said the city would have to begin evacutation 72 hours prior to the arrival of a category 3 storm in order to get all the poor people out. In fact, that’s explicity what the long evac shedule was for, because New Orleans has SO MANY people living off of welfare.

In fact, the school busses and the city transit busses were supposed to be used for exactly that purpose (72 hours before the storm was supposed to make land fall).

The fact that you are unwilling to “make moral judgements” about people who shoot at rescuers and rape people during a crisis shows that you have zero (0) common sense. You’re better off talking about whatever you would normally talk about when not talking about politics, humanity, or anything else requiring a smidgeon of brain power.

“Making these sorts of moral judgments when you’re not ‘in the shit’ is very easy.”

I don’t have to be “in the shit” to know what those people did was wrong. You are excusing the most barbaric and animalistic behavior because I was not directly participating in it? Tell you what, come on over to my house. Let me rape you and shoot at you for a while, and let’s see if I still have the same mindset when I’m finished with you.

If I don’t, I’ll post an appology. Then I’ll call up the victims and explain to them that they were over-reacting and if they were only on the other side of the shooting and raping, they’d have a better understanding of the situation.

“The federal government is responsible for emergency plans when the level of catastrophe raises above a certain level. In the case of NOLA, the state government of LA requested a National Disaster be declared before the hurricane made landfall, and the federal government agreed. Once that happens, FEMA is supposed to take a much more active role.”

The President proclaimed New Orleans a federal disaster area 48 hours prior to the storm. After that, it was the Governor’s responsibility to ask the federal government to step in. She did not do so for 24 hours AFTER the storm hit. The President can not unilaterally walk in and take over until the Governor asks for help. It protects the state’s rights and the rights of the people in that state. The federal government is not a grandfatherly old man with everyone’s best intentions in mind.

You have less of an idea of how the process works than I do, so you should stay quiet on this topic. FEMA took an active role when it was told to. FEMA did what they were supposed to do in this situation. They could not go into New Orleans because it was in total chaos, AND because the disaster was still occuring. It is their job to stay out of the disaster and to take care of those who get out of the disaster area. Then, after the disaster is over, they go in and clean up. They do not walk into a currently deteriorating situation to create even more chaos and loss of human life. Had FEMA and other relief agencies gone in before the situation was FINALLY brought under control by the feds, things would be MUCH worse.

Comment by Jaycen Rigger — 9/7/2005 @ 7:33 pm

Sunday, August 28, 2005

More MUD-Dev

The "Reasons for play" thread has been a great debate, so far. Reading it and other threads, a few generalized debating points keep springing to mind. I'm pointing to this particular thread and more specifically this particular post because it contains so many of the points I'd like to make. I'm certainly not picking on Sean, Damien, or Mike. All of you have made excellent points and counter points and I really like most of what you three guys have to say, especially when you disagree with each other;-)

In particular, my appologies to Mike, up front, as I'll be quoting him - though many of you guys tend to make the same points from time to time.


>Single-point anecdote explains nothing. Look at the population;
>look at what they buy. You can't generalize from what one person
>likes.

You MUST generalize from what one person likes....otherwise, where would any ideas begin? One person had to like "something" before another person could figure out that, "hey, maybe more people like that something and will pay me to provide it".

Single-point anecdotes DO explain some things. They may not be indicative of the largest population, but they point to smaller markets. Some people do very well selling to a niche.

>There's an image problem, sure -- but it's caused by the kinds of games we
>produce!

I just don't think that's true. This is one of those single-point anecdotes, so take it for what it's worth.

I have single-handedly brought "gaming" to my place of business. I've gotten 5 different people in my company to start playing MORPGs and a couple to start playing shooters like TFC. Currently, I'm trying to get my boss into playing TFC. I know he'd love it if he tried it, but his problem is getting past the hardware barrier and understanding that the game isn't as complicated as it looks. He's watched me play it a couple times, but isn't sure about installing it on his own and blundering through the controls.

Point? He's almost 40, much higher on the socio-economic ladder than me, yet his interest is piqued by a game played mostly by teens and 20-somethings that involves slaughtering your friends on-line. His reluctance has nothing to do with image, and everything to do with just being "old and out of the loop" when it comes to "doing that on-line stuff". That's a technology/confidence problem, not a game-image problem.

>Frankly, that you don't seem to see the significance of the gender
>issue here is an exemplar of the blindness endemic in many game
>developers.

This is a personal pet-peeve. As my high-school German teacher always said, "Words have gender, people have sex." See? It's very easy to remember. When speaking about the difference between men and women, it is inappropriate to use the word gender. Just because some knee-jerk ninnies have made it popular, doesn't make it right. You can use the word sex. We're all big kids. We can handle it. Thanks.

>I've worked with people in the past who discounted
>women's general distaste for games as coming from anything in the
>games or the industry itself.

Totally agree. Too many devs are content to "blame the players" instead of focusing on the real problem; the devs.

>It couldn't possibly be because our games are made by, for, and with
>a young white unmarried male world view, could it?

SUPER big pet-peeve of mine. Please explain what my world view is, since you seem to have the handle on it? I'm married though, so does my world view differ significantly from unmarried, white males? When people who use phraseology such as that speak, they sound sexist, racist, and socialist.

I'm willing to bet money that black men are pretty much excited by the same game elements as white men. Maybe what you meant to say was "rich, white, unmarried men who grew up and live in the suburbs"? Because then maybe those kind of men aren't turned on by the same things that "poor, black unmarried men who grew up and live in the inner-city" are turned on by. Or maybe they are. Either way, it makes my skin crawl to hear someone who's probably a young, white unmarried man talk about a "world view" as if he can speak for everyone else.

>There is abundant data that men and women vary
>neurologically from the gross anatomical to molecular scale, in
>structures ranging from the cortical sulci to the amygdaloid nucleus
>in the limbic system to the corpus callosum and cortical neuronal
>density. There are significant gender differences in attention,
>reaction, verbal and spatial reasoning, bilateral activation, and
>memory formation, among other areas.

I'm surprised Sean wasn't already more aware of just that. You can hardly watch the Discovery channel or pick up a copy of Scientific American without seeing information to this effect. I thought everyone was already on-board with these concepts. The fact that Mike points out the social injustices tied to the research is just an annoyance. For one, I don't care. For two, I'm sick of hearing it. For three "social injustices" just aren't that un-just and have already faded in American society for most reasonable people.

Men and women are very different. They can still have the same personality types, but those categorizations are typically broader definitions of human behavior. I think it's important to examine both sides of how the sexes are alike and different in their emotional/psychological responses to games.

>I wasn't aware we were in the business of creating gamers.

In fact, I'm quite sure you are aware, Mike. You DON'T want more people to start playing games? I thought that was the sole purpose of the corporate angle on gaming. The more people who game, the more money your companies make. If your companies AREN'T in the business of drawing in more clients, then they ought to be.

>More to the point, I think we're better off creating games that *people*
>will play, rather than trying to create new kinds of people.

Oh....I see....more of that mentality. Ugh.

You can't categorize *people* because that dehumanizes them, or something? What do you think you've been doing already, Mike? Leave the politics and ideology out of the discussion. Your logic starts to wane when you attack the problem from this perspective and it just sounds like wishy-washy hippie-talk.

>Drive the game to the people, don't try to make the people conform to the
>game.

See what I mean? "Don't label me, man."

What I think you're trying to say is "devs shouldn't want the player to be a better player for the game they create, they should want to make the game cater to the player they're trying to draw in", or something like that. But I don't want to put words in your mouth. I just want to drag the conversation back into the realm where red-staters like me won't turn off as soon as we read your posts.

>The 'low-end machine' thing is interesting -- EA execs were
>concerned that its graphics looked dated when it was released. And
>yet, it went strong for several years, eclipsing hundreds of games
>with "killer graphics" but same-old same-old gameplay.

Interesting in that we've already heard a lot of this already. Graphics and immersion don't seem to be as important as content, or mechanics.

I think Sean's real point was that the game sold big partly becuase it ran well on cheaper and older machines, regardless of whether that was because the graphics didn't require the hardware. Memory and speed don't always get eaten up with graphics.

Maybe there are really TWO very good points here.

>I was at Maxis when The Sims was released, and I can tell you, it's nothing like
>what you assume (and interestingly, at the time the studio had more
>women in senior positions than any other major game studio I know
>of).

I don't have an opinion on that part of the discussion, except to say that what you point out about women in senior positions just helps to underscore my points above regarding sex and social justice. No matter how "just" or "equal" our society becomes (or vice versa), human beings will still make bad/good decisions.


Those are the points I wanted to make. I hope I was able to draw the line and succesfully seperate the politics from the philosophical points. We can keep the discussions theoretical without getting "liberal".